| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kopilman Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 162
| |
froomzer Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 148
| |
Roombor Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 111
|
The existence of null is a flaw from a static typing perspective though, since it introduces runtime type errors whose absence cannot be proved at compile time
Reply with quote
|
| |
|
|
Kopilman Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 162
| |
Roombor Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 111
| |
froomzer Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 148
|
I dont know. I think ruby will get one eventually, I think they are just pigbacking off of ruby
Reply with quote
|
| |
|
|
Roombor Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 111
|
jomanda, I think ML solves the null problem in a satisfactory way using variant types. As for me, I just prefer dynamic typing
Reply with quote
|
| |
|
|
jomanda Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 19 May 2006 Posts: 70 Location: Germany
| |
froomzer Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 148
| |
Kopilman Enthusiastic Coder
Joined: 25 May 2006 Posts: 162
| |
| Page 1 of 2 |
Goto page 1, 2 Next |
|